4/30/2023 0 Comments Lightzone 4.1 9 download![]() I tried Aftershot as well, but it crashed too easily, even under Windows on a fast machine. If you were trained in Photoshop CS2, you can use GIMP without too much trouble. I think Photoshop under WINE would be a waste of time. GIMP 2.6 was a lot better than Photoshop CS2 - faster and crashed less - and GIMP is up to version 2.10 now. Of course, if you want to do any raw processing, you're pretty much limited to software already mentioned. Have you tried running an older Photoshop version under WINE? CS2 works. ![]() I tried Corel Aftershot - did not support Fuji RAF at that time years ago - but it looks like Aftershot is still available for Linux, either RPM or Debian. It used to work well with older DSLR cameras (F mount S1-S5) and JPGs, but it was bought out by Corel (and became Aftershot, and Linux support was dropped). It's too bad Bibble isn't supported anymore. Guess I would have to download it from here: Regarding LightZone, it is not in the Ubuntu repositories, and does not appear in a Software Manager search (no flatpak or AppImage). ![]() Of course plenty of other stuff is available. Usually that's all you need, and you can have it done as a default profile. RawTherapee has a better explanatory UI, but Darktable allows a more streamlined workflow for large image sets. I have much respect for RawTherapee, it is great. RawTherapee has marginally better demosaicing for X-Trans, but it's not something that is noticeable in most images. I recommend checking out the forums at to find users of both to compare and contrast them. I use this to raise the luminance of the image. It lets you drag, rotate, and feather the tool visually. Make sure to enable the on screen guide by pressing the button on the top left of the tool. This is about as close as you get to local edits. Make sure you use the detail recovery slider and you will likely need to add contrast back in as well. I recently took a nighttime picture that I completely screwed up with too much flash and ended up with a 'decent' image. This is great if you want to recover highlights or dark regions. I even used it to recover some of my wife's jpg cell phone images that she took while in a waterproof case with a hazy lens cover This is one of those magic tools that adds some 'pop' to your image. Careful not to overdo them as a little bit can go a long way lower the 'amount' slider until it looks naturalÄepending on the image, here are some of the other tools I fiddle around with.adjust contrast threshold until only the the proper level of detail is sharpened, i.e.Sharpening > RL deconvolution (zoom to 1:1).adjust luminance slider under L*A*B to taste.apply a film sim (some nice Fuji clones here ).if using a native Fuji lens, set lens correction to auto.set demosaic to 3 pass + fast (use the auto contrast threshold).One thing to remember is that all tools must be enabled to be able to use them and can be toggled on and off. My basic workflow goes something like this (sorry, I don't have it in front of me so I am working from memory). The devs seem to have a philosophy that the more choices the better. I agree that RT can be overwhelming, but one thing to remember is there are often multiple ways to achieve the same or similar results. I believe RT has a reputation for overall higher image quality, but you will will not be able to any local edits natively (although there is a developmental branch that is working on this) If you ask why, it is because when I started using RT, DT wasn't available on Windows yet. I'm asking because I realize there will be a steep learning curve, so I'd like to pick just one and stick with it. ![]() For those that are proficient with both, which did you choose, and why? Does one render Fuji RAW files better than the other? I've briefly tried both Rawtherapee and Darktable. I only own a Linux machine and I like the idea of using software that doesn't require a subscription. I've always tried to use SOOC jpegs, but I'd like to get into the post-processing game. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |